<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/</link>
	<description>Frank S. Robinson&#039;s blog on life, society, politics, and philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:53:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethical_</title>
		<link>http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/#comment-5934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethical_]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=1616#comment-5934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally someone who isn&#039;t afraid to take the conversation somewhere productive! 

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/11/16/the-missing-ingredient-to-womens-happiness/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone who isn&#8217;t afraid to take the conversation somewhere productive! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/11/16/the-missing-ingredient-to-womens-happiness/" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/11/16/the-missing-ingredient-to-womens-happiness/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy5759</title>
		<link>http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy5759]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=1616#comment-2820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I ought to be glad that I missed the now deleted illustration.

AMS; congratulations on having achieved a brilliant career, and having two children (whom I am sure are much loved and well nurtured). The strength of women as homemakers is the stuff of legend. To transfer that strength to business/government should, on paper serve only to strengthen society. However the law of unintended consequences raises its ugly head; we gain very little in business/government but lose so much more in the development of  the next generation. Not to mention the support wives provide their husbands in their business/government careers. The only change that could enable women to stay in the game is probably to move towards a state crèche system. Oh, what deep joy that would bring to the progressives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I ought to be glad that I missed the now deleted illustration.</p>
<p>AMS; congratulations on having achieved a brilliant career, and having two children (whom I am sure are much loved and well nurtured). The strength of women as homemakers is the stuff of legend. To transfer that strength to business/government should, on paper serve only to strengthen society. However the law of unintended consequences raises its ugly head; we gain very little in business/government but lose so much more in the development of  the next generation. Not to mention the support wives provide their husbands in their business/government careers. The only change that could enable women to stay in the game is probably to move towards a state crèche system. Oh, what deep joy that would bring to the progressives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne-Marie Slaughter</title>
		<link>http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/#comment-2789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne-Marie Slaughter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=1616#comment-2789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please re-read the article. I am in no way complaining about my situation. I have kids I adore and plenty of career success, precisely because I had enough flexibility in academia to be able to stay in the game and keep rising even w/ 2 sons. Women who are in non-flexibile careers face tensions that they cannot work around and so many leave the leadership track. We&#039;d be a better society if they stayed in the game. So we need changes to make that happen. Period.

[FSR comment: My sincere thanks for a serious response. I do understand what you&#039;re saying, but my point is that most people &lt;em&gt;can&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; be full-bore parents while pursuing a full-blast career. Life is imperfect and entails choices.]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please re-read the article. I am in no way complaining about my situation. I have kids I adore and plenty of career success, precisely because I had enough flexibility in academia to be able to stay in the game and keep rising even w/ 2 sons. Women who are in non-flexibile careers face tensions that they cannot work around and so many leave the leadership track. We&#8217;d be a better society if they stayed in the game. So we need changes to make that happen. Period.</p>
<p>[FSR comment: My sincere thanks for a serious response. I do understand what you're saying, but my point is that most people <em>can't</em> be full-bore parents while pursuing a full-blast career. Life is imperfect and entails choices.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faithful reader</title>
		<link>http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/why-women-still-cant-have-it-all/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faithful reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=1616#comment-2788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That picture is a tiny bit disturbing.
Could you maybe not put stuff like that into posts? Thank you. :)

[FSR: Thanks for your comment. Sorry. I have in fact removed the picture. I myself have a high threshold of tolerance for such things, and sometimes it&#039;s hard to judge how others might see it.] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That picture is a tiny bit disturbing.<br />
Could you maybe not put stuff like that into posts? Thank you. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>[FSR: Thanks for your comment. Sorry. I have in fact removed the picture. I myself have a high threshold of tolerance for such things, and sometimes it's hard to judge how others might see it.] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
