Psychics & the Law; also Eleanor Smeal speech

Hanne Stinson, British Humanist Association Executive Director spoke about a new UK law that criminalizes “psychics” who defraud people with false claims. The question was posed as when religious practices are so harmful that they should be deemed crimes. However, she held that “psychics” are not generally acting out of belief, but are perpetrating calculated frauds. She stressed cases in which the vulnerability of bereaved people is exploited by these creeps who actually make their psychological situation worse. Ms. Stinson characterized the new law as putting psychics under the same rules as any tradesman providing a service. The burden is now on the practitioner to prove he did not offer something he could not deliver.
Wendy Kaminer, a noted lawyer and civil liberties advocate, dissented, mainly on the burden of proof issue. She agreed that intentional fraud should be prosecuted, but the principle of “innocent until proven guilty” should be maintained. Proving a negative is hard and puts an intolerable burden on the defendant, whose life can well be ruined by a prosecution, even if it ultimately fails. Similar prosecutions could be brought against therapists. Kaminer asserted that if people want to go to these kinds of practitioners, it’s really none of the state’s business; this is a soft form of authoritarianism; there are a lot of abuses in life, and there’s not always a remedy in criminal law. Let’s not give the state too much power over us. (In case it’s not already obvious, I agree.)

* * * *
Eleanor Smeal, former President of the National Organization for Women and inventor of the “gender gap” received an award. I frankly did not care for her speech.
Smeal had a lot to say about the Democratic presidential contest, and the press coverage, complaining that the press focuses on trivia at the expense of serious matters, and that coverage of Clinton’s campaign was misogynist and sexist. She said “the press is no longer reporting the news but shaping it.” (I am shocked, shocked.)
This was followed up by her loudest, most intensely expressed remarks: a partisan rant against McCain.
Another point was population control. Opposition to population control, Smeal said, is motivated by—can you guess?—the desire to keep Third World labor cheap! This takes cynicism to new heights, and epitomizes the lamentable trend in our politics to address issues by ascribing evil motives to those who don’t agree with you.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Psychics & the Law; also Eleanor Smeal speech”

  1. Drona K Says:

    People spend their money as they wish in a free market. Whether one wastes money on video games, prostitutes, gambling, tobacco, alcohol, or donations to their church, or psychics – it is the individual’s choice to do so. If these activities lead to harm to others (i.e. drunk driving accidents, knowingly spreading HIV, stealing to support one’s habit, the rape of children by Catholic Priests, etc), there are lwas in place to punish the offenders. Some of these activities result in damage to others that is not always obvious. Smokers contaminate the health of others through second hand smoke. Smokers also have higher risks for heart disease, cancer, emphysema and other diseases. As we all pay into the medicare/medicaid system, we all pay for the smokers extra heathcare costs. Should the nonsmoker pay this extra burden to allow the smoker his freedom to smoke? I don’t want to pay into any of these entitlement programs. So, the answer is perhaps to allow the smoker to smoke away from those who don’t want exposure to the pollutants but to discard entitlement programs so that we don’t have to pay for others poor self care.

  2. Barbara Garro Says:

    Good, good luck in your new endeavor. Rational Optimist, what I believe I have always been ;=]! Hello to Therese!

  3. Barbara Garro Says:

    Hmmm. Submitted comment and then it disappeared after I clicked on submit comment. Once more. Good luck in your new endeavor. I have always considered myself a rational optimist ;=]! Is there any other way to go?

  4. O.J. Says:

    Laws are the glue that holds society together,or they should be because man with all his imperfections would be a chaotic beast without them.However sometimes the law and rational thinking seem to walk in opposite directions.
    If a psychic now has a burden of proof why does a vicar
    ,priest etc. not carry the same responsibility?
    For a lifetime of servitude they promise me heaven and threaten me with hell if I don’t buy into their idea.
    Yet can they prove these places exist? 2,000 years have past and they haven’t done it yet……if you ask me there should be a law against it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s