Rene Descartes had the best opening line in the history of philosophy: cogito ergo sum (I think, therefore I am). That was his starting point for constructing a philosophy – the one thing he could be sure about was that he was cogitating.

    I have a different starting point. Mine is to ask: what matters? Why does it matter? What does mattering mean? After all, if something doesn’t matter, then why think about it at all?

    The three questions turn out to be really one question, with one answer. What matters, ultimately, is what sentient beings feel. It matters because there just isn’t anything else that could matter. If there were no sentient beings to experience joy or suffering, then whether or not the universe even exists wouldn’t matter. Because for something to matter, there has to be someone to whom it matters. Otherwise the concept of “mattering” makes no sense. “Mattering” means mattering to someone.

    By “sentient beings,” I mean beings with consciousness – self-awareness, with the capability to experience feelings, such as suffering or joy, to know they are being experienced, and to respond to the feelings. The prime example is a human being. It would include some other higher animals (say, elephants) as well, that experience such feelings. It would not include clams, insects, or trees. And certainly not rocks or rivers or planets (sorry, “Gaia” people, the Earth is not sentient).

    Some people have big cosmic beliefs. Okay; believe what you like. But nothing there can matter to human beings unless, in some way, it has an effect upon feelings that take place in human minds. If it doesn’t, then even if the belief is true, it’s an irrelevance.

    The foregoing gives us the foundation point for a philosophy that matters: everything is judged by its effects upon human feelings, whether positive or negative, conducive to suffering or joy. What we do affects human feelings, our own and those of others. This is the way in which our lives matter, and have meaning.

    There is nothing else.

2 Responses to “Mattering”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    I believe you are expressing the concept of relevance. Politicians can steal whatever they want and harm whomever they want – as long as I can enjoy my own life (Rush Limbaugh is a good example of a person who promotes this philosophy).

  2. Gregory Kipp Says:

    This question points out the fact that everything really is relative. Issues matter only to the extent they affect one’s current state of being. This is not to say there are no absolutes. The human condition is an absolute within a relative framework, and humans will always judge issues with respect to our given state of being. Rocks will always seem hard to people because of our relative softness. But rocks can be soft by some other measure. Similar frameworks apply to every aspect of human existence, including moral, legal, religious, etc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: