A brand new, Grand NEW Party?

    When Tony Blair won leadership of the British Labor Party, it had long been unelectable. A previous party platform had been dubbed “the longest suicide note in history” because of its loony left agenda. Blair set out to fix that, most importantly by getting Labor to rescind the dearest left-wing shibboleth of the party charter, nationalization of premier business firms. And, to signal this decisive break with the party’s unappealing past, it was rechristened the “New Labor” party.

    America needs a New Republican party.

    Or, rather, a new OLD Republican party. The pre-Tom DeLay party; the pre-Jerry Falwell party; the pre-Karl Rove party; and, yes, the pre-Bush party.

    Those guys’ approach may admittedly have won a few elections, but at the cost of positioning the Republican party athwart the tides of history.

    The colossal irony of the GOP’s later years in power was how it tried to buy votes and achieved the opposite. The whole point of “pork” spending is to bribe voters (with their own money, i.e., tax dollars) – and the GOP tried to compound it with tax cuts besides, having the government go into hock to pay the bribes. But what it got for its pains was not gratitude for doling out goodies, but instead, becoming known as the bribery party.

    Somehow, the Democrats had managed to play the same game with impunity for decades. Maybe they had perfected the art of such bribery. For Republicans it did not come naturally, they weren’t slick enough at it.

    Its height was the prescription drug program. After decades in which Democrats perennially scared elderly voters that the GOP would take away their Social Security, Republicans actually imagined they could turn the tables with a massive new bribe to elderly voters. Even though existing entitlement programs were already careening toward a huge budgetary train wreck. This was fiscal insanity. The Republicans did it anyway, for the wrong reason – not because they really thought it made sense, but in a crass bid for political gain. They didn’t understand the difference between seduction and whoredom.

    As if becoming the bribery party was not enough, they also thought it was somehow a good idea to become the intolerant party, the anti-immifgrant party, the torture party, the anti-science party.

    But don’t get me started on all the ways the Democrats too have their heads up their posteriors.

    Yet I’m still an optimist. I’d far rather live in this crazy country with its crazy politics than in, say, China, with no politics at all – at least none that ordinary people can participate in. This blog would not be allowed in China. It would be shut down, and I’d be jailed.

4 Responses to “A brand new, Grand NEW Party?”

  1. Winston Smith Says:

    Are you advocating a return to the Robert Taft – Mr. Republican – type of libertarianism? Recall that the old conservative wing of the Republican party always advocated a non-interventionist foreign policy – Senator Robert Taft did not even want NATO to exist.
    From a cosmetic inspection of your perorations it is clear you support global busybodies. Who will be attending such exciting events; former Vietnam-era draft dodgers like Mr. Frank S. Robinson? It would be interesting to speculate. During what year did you determine that attending college as long as possible would guarantee a delay of 1A status?

    FSR REPLY: Actually, I was 4F.

  2. Winston Smith Says:

    I am very dubious about the authenticity of your ailments which allowed your 4F waiver – which I believe is a medical exception. Do you feel any compunction knowing that you willfully substituted yourself with someone else who, perhaps, was shipped eight thousand miles away?
    I am uncertain what supposed congenital condition generously provided for this waiver nevertheless it is probably contained in the lyrics of ‘The Draft Dodger Rag’. Although I do not know who wrote it I am familiar with the Chad Mitchell Trio recording, and perhaps you can identify your ailment in its opening lyrics – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2wJW0YoafI

    FSR: I note that “Winston Smith” (a character in 1984) does not deign to divulge his e-mail address. Nevertheless, as a believer in freedom of expression, I will refrain from exercising my prerogative of deleting his postings. ‘Nuff said.

  3. Anonymous Says:

    Mr. Frank S. Robinson,
    I did not bother placing my email since I have established some relatively complex automatic delete functions which deletes almost all incoming emails. Incidentally, I deactivated those functions after your magnanimous choice to not delete my comments. You may recall my address since I maintained controversy with you previously. I encountered your website – in the phraseology of Horace Walpole – due to serendipity.
    I am pleased to learn of your interest in 1984.

  4. A person who admires Joseph Conrad too much Says:

    I received your email regarding the publishing of your new book and it reminded me that I never provided my final rejoinder. My father was not a draft dodger, he was conscripted. He did not go to college therefore he was listed as 1A. I trust I have made my point sufficiently clear.
    Congratulations on the publishing of your book.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: