“We can absorb a terrorist attack”

The latest kerfuffle concerns President Obama’s saying “We can absorb a terrorist attack.” As though this somehow bespeaks callousness or complacency. As columnist Ruth Marcus observes, should he have rather said we’d crumble if hit again?

Obama’s words were obviously commonsensical. Unfortunately, that’s not reflected in actual administration policy, which continues as though trying to prevent terrorist attacks is one of our highest priorities,

It is not. In fact, the billions spent on this is a colossal misdirection of resources. The truth is that terrorism can’t hurt us very much. In the big picture, not even a radiological or biological attack would bring the country to its knees. (The big danger from such an attack would be government overreaction.)

We face much bigger challenges. Such as falling behind on education. And just for some perspective, while terrorist deaths are tragic, in the past decade we lost a hundred times more people in auto accidents. We “absorb” that too – hardly even think about it. But just imagine how many lives could be saved if all those TSA employees rummaging through your luggage were instead tasked with working to improve road safety.

As Obama said, we did absorb the 9/11 attacks, and are stronger. His comment was actually a tribute to the American character. But that doesn’t stop people trying to manufacture an issue by twisting his words.

Such “gotcha” nonsense is a bane of our public life. Despite serious global issues on our plate, we are continuously distracted by stupid little ones (like mosque locations and Koran abuse). Local public radio boss Alan Chartock constantly natters about “the politics of distraction,” as though some sinister forces cunningly cook up these side issues deliberately to distract us from larger ones. That’s utter rubbish. No – the fact is that we are too easily bewitched by issues that engage our simplistic reptilian reflexes. Thinking about how to respond to globalization’s economic challenges, for example, is hard work. Much easier to think about where a mosque should or shouldn’t be built.*

*I plead guilty, I did a blog post about that issue myself.

Advertisements

One Response to ““We can absorb a terrorist attack””

  1. bruce Says:

    We face much bigger challenges. Such as falling behind on education. And just for some perspective, while terrorist deaths are tragic, in the past decade we lost a hundred times more people in auto accidents. We “absorb” that too – hardly even think about it. But just imagine how many lives could be saved if all those TSA employees rummaging through your luggage were instead tasked with working to improve road safety.

    I can’t imagine the total worthlessness of driving given such a practice.
    Unless your goal is to make rapid transit worthwhile. Either way you have effectively destroyed a wonderful freedom. Ooooh I did not mean for this to lead here, freedom has its costs. But maybe it does.

    FSR RESPONSE: Oops, maybe I wasn’t clear enough. I most certainly did not mean having TSA personnel inspecting our cars or otherwise interfering with us! No, what I meant is that road safety could stand a lot of improvement, and government money spent in that direction could save a lot more lives than does all that nonsense at airport security lines.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s