“Public” Broadcasting and Partisan WAMC Radio

We’re great fans of PBS TV, and maintain membership through monthly contributions. But while at one time, PBS programming was unique, the TV landscape has totally changed, and today most viewers have hundreds of choices. PBS is no longer even noncommercial, with ads little different from those elsewhere. So I agree with Mitt Romney that taxpayers should not continue subsidizing this; since PBS caters to more upscale viewers, it’s one more example of welfare for the rich.

Some accuse PBS of left-wing bias, and though that’s certainly true of Bill Moyers shows, in general the network does strive to be neutral and fair. Among news discussion programs, The McLaughlin Group always balances the political viewpoints of its participants, and those on Washington Week never let slip such personal leanings.

Similar things can be said of National Public Radio. But not the local NPR affiliate, WAMC. I listen all the time, and it has some great stuff (the book guy, Joe Donahue, is terrific). However, while its boss and ubiquitous on-air presence, Dr. Alan Chartock (quoted on Wikipedia) insists that it maintains editorial neutrality and includes as many conservative commentators as liberal ones, that is laughably disingenuous. I myself was once, 30 years ago, a “conservative” WAMC commentator (I was dropped; perhaps I wasn’t very good). Since then, the station’s left-wing slant has become much more blatant. It gives a few minutes weekly to one token conservative opinionist (Herb London); all the rest are on the left. The Alternative Radio show has hour-long hard left rants. Chartock himself, who hogs a lot of air time as WAMC’s “political commentator” and chief interviewer, while also emceeing frequent call-in shows as well as thrice annual week-long fund drives, does not even try to soft-peddle his cheer-leading for Democrats and “progressives” and their pet causes like anti-fracking. He openly declares he backs Obama and relentlessly smears Republicans. During the recent fund drive, he made clear that he was asking “progressives” (and, really, only them) to support “their” station. “Just because you’re progressive,” Chartock said, “doesn’t mean you don’t have money!” (He should know, with his $200,000 salary.) And  after the presidential debate, the fund drive patter was pointedly all Big Bird.

By Marquil, Hill Country Observer

Not surprisingly, WAMC has indeed cultivated an overwhelmingly left-leaning and devoted fan base. Its political call-in shows are almost completely one-sided. When there is a rare dissonant voice, Chartock claims to welcome that; however, while he fawns over callers who agree with him, he is generally curt and dismissive toward those who don’t. I have experienced this myself more than once; no wonder he gets few such calls. (Is Chartock as bad as Hannity, et al? No. But bad enough.)

Wikipedia’s WAMC article notes that NPR’s official policy for affiliate stations is to be “fair, unbiased, accurate, honest, and respectful of the people that are covered.” WAMC conspicuously violates this policy. Wikipedia quotes a Washington-based NPR news producer who happened to tune in to WAMC while on a New York trip, who said that Chartock’s in-your-face political bias made his jaw drop to the floor and “really freaked me out.” He was disturbed that Chartock’s “crazy” behavior undermines NPR’s effort to maintain public confidence in its fairness.

WAMC may be violating not only NPR policy but also, arguably, the law. It is a charitable 501(c)(3) organization, receiving tax-deductible donations. Partisan politics are off-limits to such entities. This has been a big issue for churches, when candidates are endorsed from pulpits. Why shouldn’t the same strictures apply to Chartock’s overt on-air partisanship?

I’m a free speech absolutist, and if Chartock wants to run a “progressive” radio station, that’s fine. But don’t try to tell us it is neutral and unbiased. Don’t cloak it as a “public” radio station. And don’t ask taxpayers to fund it.

Dr. Alan Chartock

But he does, and we do, and not only via the tax-deductibility of contributions.* Some years back, Chartock tried to drum up donations by claiming a supposed Republican conspiracy to silence WAMC by cutting its state funding.** (Why would they, if the station wasn’t biased?) But since then, the conspiracy of silence seems to be about WAMC’s public funding itself. The station’s budget is not made public – perhaps odd for an organization soliciting donations. And for all the declamations of solidarity with Big Bird in the fund drive, I didn’t hear a word about WAMC itself receiving public funding as well.***

After some internet sleuthing, I was able to confirm that WAMC does receive money from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which gets $400 million annually from the federal government. The station also gets money from the New York State Office of Educational Television and Public Broadcasting, whose website says the details of such funding can be found on the websites of each recipient broadcaster; but for WAMC, such is not the case. So I still don’t know the amounts. I guess transparency and honesty are not “progressive” values.****

Taxpayer support for a radio station with such an openly partisan political stance is simply wrong. Especially if only one side of the political debate is being thusly funded. Do any right-wing broadcasters receive public money like WAMC? I don’t think so.

WAMC and Big Bird ain’t birds of a feather; Big Bird’s feathers are not colored “progressive.”

* When a donation is tax deductible, effectively the Treasury pays for part of it. Political contributions are not tax-deductible.

** An oft-heard Chartockism is, “I don’t want to engage in conspiracy theories, but … “ Another favorite tactic to scare up donations is threatening to drop the most popular programs like Car Talk and, recently, Alternative Radio. “I’ll yank it right off the air,” Chartock said, “and don’t think I won’t.” I do think he won’t.

*** Also curiously never heard from is WAMC’s Board of Trustees which, strangely for a “progressive” outfit, is not elected by the membership. While WAMC’s website lists the trustees, there is no clue about how they’re selected. Nor any contact information.

**** The fund drives always feature “challenges” where some donor says he’ll give $X if they can raise a certain amount by a certain deadline. As the deadline nears, they always seem far short. Yet somehow they always claim to make it. Fishy? [Added 10/15: this footnote, upon more considered reflection, is snarky,  and I would delete it if I didn’t feel doing so would be dishonest.]

Tags: , ,

7 Responses to ““Public” Broadcasting and Partisan WAMC Radio”

  1. rationaloptimist Says:

    After letting WAMC’s Joe Donahue know about my post, we had the following e-mail exchange:

    Joe: Sounds like a weird threat. The post is very odd with many untruths.
    Me: A threat?? My, my. And if there are untruths, I would genuinely appreciate having them specified, so I can correct them.
    Joe: No need to engage. If you truly cared about the facts, you would have contacted us in the first place.
    Me: Right. Of course.

    [If anyone does know of any inaccuracies in my post, please let me know.]

  2. Glenn M. Heller Says:

    WAMC Northeast Public Radio, Inc. has been a scam and a fraudulent enterprise since Day One more than 30 years ago when Alan Chartock and three other politically-connected ‘corporators’ were awarded the highly-valuable WAMC broadcast license without ever having to go through any sort of formal public-bidding process, the kind that would normally apply any time a state agency sought to dispose of any valuable state-controlled asset.
    One day the 10,000-watt WAMC broadcast license (90.3 FM) was public property, owned by the taxpayers of the State of New York via licensee Albany Medical College then a division of the New York State Education Department.
    The next day, that oh-so-valuable broadcast asset, with rights to use the highly desirable broadcast tower high atop Mt. Greylock in neighboring Massachusetts, had been transferred to WAMC Northeast Public Radio, Inc., an ‘educational’ non-stock entity set up and wholly controlled by Alan Chartock & Company.
    And that’s the way things stand to the present day.

    [FSR comment: I frankly take issue with your characterization. My understanding of this may be somewhat vague, but it seemed to me in the ’70s that the original station run by the Medical College was moribund and failing, Chartock thought he could make something more of it, so took it over, and obviously fulfilled the objective. Back when I was a commentator, circa 1981-82, I had the impression the station was politically balanced, but as mentioned in my blog post, that changed as Dr. Chartock became more of an on-air presence. I wouldn’t use words like fraud or scam, but I do think it’s dishonest to claim political balance, and as a matter of public concern, I consider it inappropriate for a broadcaster with such an open political bias to receive public funding.
    I notice that in today’s “thank you” message regarding the now-concluded fund drive, they include thanks to Mitt Romney!! Obviously they’re facetiously thanking him for giving them the Big Bird trope. If that doesn’t clearly demonstrate political bias, I don’t know what would.]

  3. Glenn M. Heller Says:

    “….. the original station run by the Medical College was moribund and failing, Chartock thought he could make something more of it, so took it over ….”

    Whether or not Albany Medical College was making best use of its assets is not the issue.
    (At the time, WAMC-FM 90.3 was broadcasting classical music nearly 24/7 and that suited many listeners — including myself — just fine.)

    The college may have been losing money on its radio station operations, but that did not mean the FCC license was worthless.
    To the contrary, the college’s FCC license at public auction in 1981 would likely have fetched at least in the low seven figures as a result of WAMC’s unique antenna location (the top of the highest mountain in Massachusetts) giving the relatively small 10,000 watt transmitter an unusually high Effective Radiated Power (ERP) and primary signal coverage over half of Massachusetts.

    To your point, just how does a private citizen ‘take over’ a state-owned asset without having to go through the legal process of submitting a bid either at a public auction or in sealed form in competition with other bidders in a public process advertised with plenty of notice in various publications to attract the maximum number of bidders?
    Normally, whenever New York State disposes of any assets, it advertises far and wide for bids and monies generated from these auction sales are deposited in the New York State treasury.
    The WAMC license transfer took place without regard to any of these criteria and the State treasury received nothing upon the Education Department’s signing over Albany Medical College’s FCC license to Mr. Chartock’s little clique.
    The transference of the WAMC license took place almost entirely behind closed doors with only a few insiders (like Mr. Chartock) aware as to what was actually being contemplated.
    The whole process was without any doubt a sham from start to finish.
    One might as well consider Albany Medical College’s FCC license stolen from New York State’s taxpayers.

  4. Frederick stafford Says:

    I enjoy listening to Alan Chartock. I certainly do not always agree with him but he makes good points in the progressive vein. He has called people names which should be beneath him and i don’t ilke that. As for conservatve political views or equal time i need to go to other local private station talk shows because i don’t hear it on WAMC. I think Alan has drifted away from a real commitment to freedom of speech while on the public dime.

  5. Weiner, Spitzer, and Other Shameful Characters | The Rational Optimist Says:

    […] (as I’ve said before), Chartock’s blatant on-air partisanship is indefensible for a radio station receiving public […]

  6. Toff Says:

    I’d contacted Chartock for some help with a professor in the Communication Department at UAlbany who had filed a false police report in retaliation for his having been reported for sexual harassment. Chartock is Professor Emeritus of that department.

    Chartock has a bit of a history with sexual harassment himself, I understand from Glenn M. Heller’s website? Chartock didn’t respond to my e-mails. I tried broaching the subject with Chartock on one of his call-in programs on which he was spreading misinformation about the university and he cut me off and hung up on me.

    The so-called police “chief” at the university, a man who has no problem with false police reports, was appointed during the Presidency of Chartock’s friend Karen R. Hitchcock. All coincidences, surely.

    One of a few e-mails to Chartock, a man who is cool with sexual harassment.

    Subject: Fwd: McNeill’s Dec. 9, 2011 cease & desist order: valid & enforced by UPD or not?
    Date: July 3, 2012 at 12:43:57 PM EDT
    To: “Shirley M. Tilghman” , John Monfasani , Rosemary Armao , Alan Chartock

    Students are supposed to report academic dishonesty; the entire community is supposed to know about academic dishonesty, in fact.

    Students are supposed to be free to seek help regarding harassment, and are even encouraged to seek help.

    “The University encourages students to accept the widest responsibility for their academic programs. […] The University at Albany expects all members of its community to conduct themselves in a manner befitting this tradition of honor and integrity. They are expected to assist the University by reporting suspected violations of academic integrity to appropriate faculty and/or administration offices. Behavior that is detrimental to the University’s role as an educational institution is unacceptable and requires attention by all citizens of its community.”

    “if you feel you are a victim of, or if you observe acts of, sexual harassment [you can] talk with a member of the counseling center staff, a residence hall director, an academic advisor, a residence assistant, a faculty member, or a supervisor.”

    It’s not been my experience that the University at Albany treats students who report academic honesty or who report sexual harassment and retaliation very well. We’ll see if the tide ever changes, I guess.

  7. John B Says:

    I have been having a few dialogs with Alan about the lack of diversity on his panelist structure, which on 9 days out of 10 is loaded with individuals who only support his own progressive views. When asked about compliance with CPB’s code of ethics – he quickly uses the free speech argument. However in that same email thread, he personally intervened and suppressed commentary I had made to the station’s website. So much for free speech on a public radio station when it doesn’t match Alan’s views. In any event, WAMC in my opinion is a poster child for why public funding shouldn’t used. While some of the NPR content is very good, tax dollars shouldn’t be given to entitles that lack a control oversight model.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: