A Wonderful Roman Coin

My main life is not blogging but numismatics; I’m a full-time coin dealer and still a collector too. What I probably love most is Roman coins; and recently obtained one that particularly pleased me. I thought I’d share why, to give you some flavor of this esoteric pursuit.

I especially enjoy Fourth Century Roman, after Diocletian’s reform, which actually introduced a parade of routinized, repetitive, boring coin designs. But there are interesting variations, and also some completely oddball types. And, in the context of all the routine ones, those oddballs really have pizzazz.

max1My new acquisition falls into that category. It’s a half follis of Maxentius, max2who ruled from 306 to 312 (but only in parts of Italy and a few other bits; he ultimately fell to Constantine I). Typical for this period, most of Max’s coins conform to one basic type: a bronze follis (around 1-1/2 inches) with a temple on the back. A second type (Dioscuri and horses) is less common. Between them, that’s probably 98% of Maxentius coins. But then there are the oddballs: like the half follis. Indeed, while there were many quarter follis coins (tough to find in nice condition), the halfsie was pretty much unique to Maxentius. And it’s no mere smaller version of the follis; it’s a special type with the goddess Victory writing on a shield, “VOT X” (signifying an optimistic ruler’s vow to serve ten more years.) Thus an unusual and interesting coin.

Ancient coins in more typical condition

Ancient coins in more typical condition

I’ve mentioned condition. This is extremely important in numismatics generally, but especially for ancient coins, most of which were found in the ground. Gold and silver can survive pretty well, but bronze is very susceptible to corrosion. Vast quantities have been recovered, but only a tiny percentage in top quality.

Which is what I go for. I never disparage anyone collecting run-of-the-mill coins, of course they’re still very historical and all. But for my collection, I am an insufferable condition snob. I’ve noticed even great collections, when auctioned, usually contain some blah specimens. Not mine.

Yet contradictorily for such a picky connoisseur, I’m also a bottom-feeder/bargain-hunter/cheapskate. I could actually afford to buy most any coin I’d like, but I see no challenge in that; anybody can throw money around. The sport of the thing is to find coins at what I consider favorable (well, cheap) prices. And that can be done because for ancient coins in particular, value isn’t cut-and-dried, with pricing highly variable. Also, collecting this way, effortfully, makes each acquisition, and the entire collection, more meaningful to me as an achievement

As noted, the great majority of Fourth Century Roman coins are routinized types, and while again the percentage in top quality is tiny, it’s a percentage of a very large population; so you can find them at surprisingly reasonable prices (like $20 to $50). However, for less usual types, the low survivability rate makes topnotch specimens truly elusive.

The tension between inclusivity and quality poses dilemmas. An example was a quite rare Constantine I “Adventus” follis. Normally I’d only collect such coins in “Extremely Fine” grade. This one was lovely, but only Very Fine, thus without the full detailing I look for. Yet such an important and cool type. After agonizing, I did keep it for my collection. (Similar dilemmas can afflict a choice between two coins. One might be better on one side but worse on the other; one with more detail, the other a more attractive patina; et cetera.)

images-4The Maxentius half follis is also my kind of coin, long coveted to round out my Maxentius section, but I’d never found one at a good price. I finally got it at a monthly Albany show. I’d known the dealer for years, but was surprised to see him here. He’d taken a table the previous month, but not this time; we went to the bar, where I picked through his hefty boxful of ancient coins. Typically, nearly all were (to me) way overpriced; but I did find a few worth buying.

The Maxentius wasn’t the costliest. That was an Augustus denarius with bull reverse, and a great portrait, but the back messed up, at $685. It was quite a job bargaining him down from $800, especially that last $15. I was betting I could improve the look of the back, and it did turn out beautifully. Such cleaning and similar restorative work is another part of my fun with ancient coins; it’s a real art (and also a big aspect of acquiring good coins on the cheap). Indeed, truthfully, I enjoy coins’ “objectness,” the whole preservation thing, even totally divorced from their cultural/historical significance.

Maxentius was $115. I wouldn’t have paid much more. It too had a condition issue, some encrustation. Sometimes its removal can uncover corrosion beneath; but this coin proved to have just the kind of encrustation you want, basically just impacted dirt harmlessly removable. UnknownNow it’s perhaps a $250 coin. Still not really a lot of money considering its rarity and quality.

And, yes, it makes my cut. Honestly, I’d like a little more hair detail on the beard, but let’s not be ridiculous, it’s a great coin, and a wonderful addition to the Frank S. Robinson collection.

P.S.  Click here for my current unreserved auction of ancient coins, with photos.


8 Responses to “A Wonderful Roman Coin”

  1. Rick Lindquist Says:

    Nice article! I have bought coins from Frank for ? 7 or 8 years and have always been pleased with the quality and price.

    While I go for the best quality I can find and afford, I am somewhat of a “type” collector and would rather have a clean VF with no flaws than an EF with issues. The wear of hands on the coins over time adds context to my enjoyment, given that it represents honest wear rather than damage.

    The beauty of the Roman Bronzes you talk about is they are accessible and affordable in great condition. I am always looking for an issue of Aurelian that I don’t have, and there are many interesting and affordable coins that are living pieces of history.

  2. djedi9 Says:

    And where’s a picture of this coin? You know, you can run over to our house any time and I would gladly snap a shot of it for you. I used to photo coins etc at Sotheby’s Wolf

  3. John Says:

    An excellent argument for starting a collection! Roman coins are still an attractive purchase, and the AE types from 300’s AD seem like bargains considering what people pay for modern material. Now, could you explain how one identifies ancient Greek coins? Romans took me a few months, Greeks are just as difficult as when I started collecting in the 1970s!

  4. rationaloptimist Says:

    Greek coins can be enigmatic. Often there’s some lettering which helps, but often none. There’s a book by Plant, Greek Coin Types & Their Identification, which is organized by theme — animals, faces, etc — and is highly useful. But occasionally I do encounter Greek coins for which I have no clue.

  5. accuratedescription.Com Says:

    Hi, I do think this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I
    may revisit yet again since i have saved as a favorite it.
    Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich and
    continue to guide others.

  6. www.medicadepot.com Says:

    Hey there! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us
    so I came to check it out. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m book-marking and will be
    tweeting this to my followers! Wonderful blog and outstanding design
    and style.

  7. Aya Waska new reggae hit Sème ! - hemp Says:

    I love what you guys are usually up too. Such clever
    work and reporting! Keep up the fantastic works guys I’ve included you guys to my personal blogroll.

  8. HealthSuppliesPlus.com Says:

    Found your article randomly – love it. Are the Roman coins still reasonably affordable?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: